![]() |
| image source google |
Islamic apologists maintain telling us that the religion of Islam is a kind, tolerant, and nonviolent religion. Every time a female is stoned or a person is beheaded or a murder bomber blows up a bus or restaurant filled with harmless people, we're advised that it's miles the work of Islamic fanatics and that authentic followers of Islam do not accept as true with this stuff.
Now we discover that in Afghanistan, a country this is ninety nine% Muslim, a man is being attempted under Sharia (Islamic regulation) for apostasy, and if convicted, will face the death penalty.
What did this guy do this became so horrible, so in opposition to the Islamic religion? He converted to Christianity, that’s the horrible factor that he did. This is apparently one of the worst matters a Muslim can do. He selected to give up the Islamic religion and consequently is so evil that he merits to be placed to death. He can be spared, however, if he agrees to emerge as a Muslim again.
The Hadith (which is stated to be the body of charges attributed to Muhammad), Sahih Bukhari Vol. 9, e-book 84, quantity 57, has been interpreted as saying “Kill whoever modifications his religion”, so the Sharia courtroom judge is providing to do simply that.
The Torah in Deuteronomy thirteen:6-10 has been interpreted as announcing approximately apostastics “But thou shalt surely kill him; thine hand shall be first upon him to place him to death, and afterward the hand of all of the people. And thou shalt stone him with stones, that he die; because he hath sought to thrust thee far away from the LORD thy God, which delivered thee out of them for apostasy.
If the Islamic religion so types, tolerant, and nonviolent, why are its laws interpreted in this type of barbaric and illiberal way by so many fans? I recognize that no longer all Muslim countries comply with Sharia law and that of these that do, no longer all are so fanatical. However, many Muslim nations nonetheless exercise amputation of one/each hand(s) for robbery, stoning for adultery, and execution for apostasy. Other international locations, including Iraq, that no longer, inside the past, comply with Sharia regulations are actually speaking approximately putting in place Sharia courts.
I additionally understand that not all Muslims interpret Islamic law in the same manner. Islamic law like any other frame of legal guidelines is subject to interpretation and consequently can be interpreted liberally, reasonably, or fundamentally. The trouble is that even as a few Muslims interpret Islamic law liberally or reasonably, it seems that a massive majority of the Muslims inside the Arabic world interpret it essentially (at least because it pertains to women and nonbelievers).
Afghanistan's charter guarantees freedom of religion, but, in an interview, Afghanistan's Foreign Minister said that the authorities had “not nothing to do” with the courtroom case. He similarly stated that he hoped there could be a “great result” to the case. To me, this appears that he is announcing that the Sharia court isn't always bound to use Afghani law and can do as it pleases, thereby making the Afghani constitution worthless. It in addition ends with the notion that Afghanistan is a democracy on paper handiest and is simply ruled by Islamic fundamentalists. These fundamentalists may not be as terrible because of the Taliban however, to date, they do not appear to be a great deal better.
Many nonsecular businesses agree that apostasy is wrong and that their faith is the best proper religion. However, I recognize no, in this day and age, aside from certain Muslim nations, that would sentence a person to demise for changing his or her religious beliefs. Such matters did happen in the beyond, observe the Spanish inquisition, but at the moment are taken into consideration as repugnant.
.jpg)
0 Comments